Skip to main content
Glama
YangHang0210

mcp-feedback-ultra

by YangHang0210
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-feedback-ultra

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mowan-mcp-feedback

      limowan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive feedback MCP server with a web UI, enabling AI-driven development workflows where AI can prompt users for feedback before taking actions, supporting platforms like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.
      2
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      favtony
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -

    • MCP Feedback Enhanced

      Littlecowherd
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with Web UI and desktop app, enabling AI to confirm with users before actions and consolidate tool calls into feedback requests.
      2
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      Minidoracat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with Web UI and desktop application dual interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users and consolidate tool calls into feedback requests to reduce costs and improve development efficiency.
      2
      844 PyPI
      3,765
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-collector

      sanshao85
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback with text and image support via a modern GUI.
      234
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve completely different purposes—feedback collection and system information—so there is no risk of misselection. An agent would never confuse them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both tools use snake_case, but the patterns differ: 'get_system_info' follows a verb_noun style, while 'interactive_feedback' is adjective_noun. This inconsistency makes the naming slightly less predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the set is minimal and borderline appropriate. The inclusion of an unrelated system utility alongside the core feedback tool dilutes the server's focus.

    Completeness4/5

    The interactive_feedback tool appears to cover the core feedback loop with its built-in usage rules, making the feedback process self-contained. However, there are no supporting tools for managing or analyzing feedback, and the system info tool doesn't contribute to the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources