Skip to main content
Glama

claw-tsaver

Ein Token-sparender MCP-Proxy für OpenClaw-Benutzer. Reduziert Tool-Call-Payloads um über 90 % durch Lazy Expansion.

Warum

MCP-Tool-Aufrufe geben oft Tausende von Token an HTML oder JSON in einer einzigen Antwort zurück – das Modell nutzt jedoch typischerweise nur 5 % davon. Die restlichen 95 % verbrauchen stillschweigend das Kontextfenster und erhöhen die Kosten. claw-tsaver sitzt zwischen OpenClaw und Ihren nachgelagerten MCP-Servern, fängt übergroße Antworten ab und übergibt dem Modell stattdessen eine kompakte Vorschau sowie ein Handle für den Abruf bei Bedarf.

Related MCP server: TokenSaver MCP

Wie

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as OpenClaw (Claude)
    participant C as claw-tsaver proxy
    participant F as fetch / puppeteer / etc.
    U->>C: call_tool("fetch", url)
    C->>F: forward call
    F-->>C: 11,507 tokens of HTML
    Note over C: tiktoken count > threshold
    C->>C: store full content in SQLite
    C-->>U: {preview_head, preview_tail, expand_handle}<br/>(only 104 tokens)
    Note over U: model decides if it needs full text
    U->>C: expand_content(handle)
    C-->>U: full 11,507 tokens

Echte Messung

Test

Ursprüngliche Token

Zurückgegebene Token

Ersparnis

fetch Wikipedia "Tokenization (data security)"

11.507

104

99,1 %

Getestet mit OpenClaw + Claude Sonnet 4.6 + mcp-server-fetch, 25.04.2026.
Rohdaten: benchmarks/mvp-day1-fetch.jsonl.

Schnellstart

1. Voraussetzungen

Installieren Sie uv (einmalige Einrichtung):

curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh

Es ist keine Installation von claw-tsaver erforderlich – uvx lädt und führt es bei Bedarf aus.

2. Nachgelagerte MCP-Server konfigurieren

Bearbeiten Sie ~/.claw-tsaver/config.json (der erste Start von claw-tsaver-mcp erstellt automatisch eine Vorlage):

{
  "downstream_servers": [
    {"name": "fetch", "command": "uvx", "args": ["mcp-server-fetch"]}
  ],
  "compression_threshold_tokens": 500
}

3. Bei OpenClaw registrieren

Fügen Sie diesen Block auf der obersten Ebene von ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json hinzu:

"mcp": {
  "servers": {
    "claw-tsaver": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["--from", "git+https://github.com/Yang1Bai/claw-tsaver",
               "claw-tsaver-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Starten Sie dann das OpenClaw-Gateway neu: openclaw gateway restart

Dashboard

Optional: eine lokale Web-Benutzeroberfläche für Statistiken zu den Token-Einsparungen in Echtzeit.

uvx --from git+https://github.com/Yang1Bai/claw-tsaver claw-tsaver-dashboard

Öffnen Sie http://localhost:7878 in Ihrem Browser.

Roadmap

  • [x] Modul A: Lazy-Expansion-Proxy (dieses Release)

  • [x] Modul D: Lokales Dashboard (dieses Release)

  • [ ] Modul B: Tool-Routing (automatisches Laden nur relevanter MCPs pro Turn)

  • [ ] Modul C: Komprimierung des Konversationsverlaufs (atomare Faktenkarten)

Lizenz

MIT – siehe LICENSE-Datei.

Mitwirken

Issues und PRs sind willkommen.

Available Tools

1 tool
expand_contentA

Retrieve the full content of a previously compressed tool result. Pass the expand_handle returned in the compressed envelope.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
handleYesThe expand_handle from a compressed result.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description implies a read operation but does not detail any side effects, auth requirements, or handle expiration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences front-load the purpose with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with no output schema, the description sufficiently guides usage, though output format is unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds context that the handle comes from a compressed envelope, complementing the schema's parameter description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the full content of a compressed result, using specific verb and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to pass the expand_handle from a compressed envelope, implying the usage context, but lacks explicit conditions or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.0.1
    • First observedexpand_content

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no potential for confusion between different tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, there is no naming inconsistency to evaluate; the name 'expand_content' is clear and descriptive.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool for expanding compressed results is very thin; the server likely needs additional tools (e.g., for listing handles) to be useful as an MCP server.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers its stated purpose of retrieving full content, but the server lacks any supporting tools for compression or handle management, leaving a minor gap in the overall surface.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that helps AI agents reduce token usage by converting data to TOON format and stripping comments and unnecessary whitespace from code files.
    31 PyPI
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that reduces AI API costs by up to 97% through token measurement, compression, caching, and pruning, all without changing prompts.
    10
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that intelligently filters and compresses tool outputs to reduce context window usage, saving up to 90% of tokens by removing noise such as passing tests and redundant information.
    5
    12 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that reduces AI agent token usage by up to 90% through intelligent context compression. Enables efficient code exploration, multi-file refactoring, and debugging by providing tools for smart reading, searching, and managing code context.
    4
    MIT