Skip to main content
Glama
YanceyOfficial

Obsidian iCloud MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Obsidian iCloud MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude.ai to your local Obsidian vault for full CRUD access, search, and daily note creation via the Model Context Protocol.
      36 npm
      14
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, create, and modify Obsidian notes via the Model Context Protocol, supporting tasks like daily notes, backlinks, and project management.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults through vector search, vault indexing, and file monitoring. It provides a standardized interface for searching and managing markdown-based personal knowledge management data within the Model Context Protocol.
      6,222 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction between LLMs and Obsidian vaults through the Model Context Protocol, supporting secure file operations, content management, and advanced search capabilities.
      6,222 npm
      676
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns an Obsidian vault into a local Model Context Protocol server that allows AI tools to directly read, search, and write to your notes. It features folder-level access control and a built-in dashboard for easy integration with tools like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      6,222 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and note management for Obsidian vaults via the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLMs to search, read, and index notes, PDFs, and web pages locally.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, such as create_directory for directory creation, edit_file for interactive editing, and read_file for single-file reading. However, there is some overlap between remove_file and remove_multiple_files, and between remove_directory and remove_multiple_directory, which could cause minor confusion in tool selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures, such as create_directory, list_directory, and read_file. This consistency makes it easy for agents to predict and understand tool functions across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the count is well-suited for a file management server, covering essential operations like create, read, edit, move, list, and delete for files and directories. This scope is comprehensive without being overwhelming, allowing for efficient agent workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for basic file operations, including CRUD for files and directories, search, and movement. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for copying files or directories, which might require workarounds, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues