WordPress MCP Custom Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to WordPress MCP Custom Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables safe reconnaissance, mutation, and verification of WordPress sites through guarded, typed verbs with dry-run previews and change-packet audit records.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for WordPress automation that enables users to manage content, themes, and site configurations using AI-driven workflows and the WordPress REST API. It provides a wide array of tools for site planning, management, and optimization compatible with tools like Cursor and Claude.36 npm1ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for managing WordPress sites through the REST API, featuring 38 tools for content, media, plugin, and theme management. It supports secure Application Password authentication and offers specific compatibility for Divi theme shortcode structures.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for WordPress content management that provides a secure interface for AI assistants to interact with WordPress sites, enabling content creation, editing, and media management without destructive operations.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA secure MCP server for WordPress content management, enabling posts, pages, media, and comment operations through natural language.301AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for publishing to WordPress. 13 tools cover posts, categories, tags, image hosting, featured images, and SEO metadata (Rank Math, etc.) One call runs the full markdown-to-live-URL pipeline.1310 npm4AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 32 tools
The tool set has 32 tools, but many are deprecated aliases for the same underlying operations. There are also overlapping validation tools (validate_urls_raw vs validate_pages vs validate_and_recheck vs autofix_safe) that are quite similar in purpose, and overlapping checklist tools. The deprecated aliases create significant ambiguity about which tool to use.
The set mixes namespace-dotted versioned names (content.list.v1, site.request.v1) with deprecated snake_case aliases (list_posts, wp_request). Even within the main names, there's inconsistent structure: some use domain.action form (content.publish.v1) while others use flat action form (read_project_file, benchmark.compare_ab.v1).
32 tools is excessive for what is genuinely a moderate-scope WordPress automation server. Critically, roughly half of the tools (13+) are deprecated aliases that should have been removed, meaning only about 19 are real and roughly half of those are legitimate. The deprecation burden inflates the count enormously.
The core surface covers content publishing, ACF updates, project file management, site options, SEO meta, W3C validation, playbooks, and benchmarks. However, there are notable gaps: no tool to update existing posts (only list and publish new), no get single post, and no delete. Content update appears limited to ACF fields rather than general post editing.