Skip to main content
Glama
YanZiBin

agent-talk

by YanZiBin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-talk

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Agent Bridge

      mafazsyed
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code and Codex to delegate persistent review or isolated write-mode implementation tasks to locally installed Claude Code or Codex runtimes, then inspect progress, approve or deny individual permission requests, and continue the same native conversation. It also lists live model catalogues, lets callers follow up on saved conversations, and can run independently via its bundled CLI.
      1
      MIT

    • Herald

      kOlapsis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      The self-hosted MCP bridge between Claude Chat and Claude Code.
      46
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (list, bind, send, create, control, etc.), but talk_list, talk_read, and talk_outbox have overlapping read functionalities—talk_read covers original client state and talk_outbox covers delivery receipts, which could cause some confusion. talk_follow and talk_delivery_control also share overlap in managing return/delivery flow.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use the consistent talk_ prefix followed by a verb (list, bind, read, send, create, delivery_control, outbox, follow, questions, answer). Minor deviation: talk_delivery_control uses a noun+verb pattern, while others use simple verbs, but the overall pattern is clear and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is a well-scoped count for a bridging/communication server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the workflow: workspace management, listing, binding, reading, sending, creating, delivery control, outbox monitoring, follow-up, and answering questions. No tool feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of creating, sending, reading, and controlling conversations, including error handling and retry semantics. Minor gap: there is no explicit tool for unblocking or archiving conversations, and permission approvals are handled externally (in DSH Web), which is a slight hole but acknowledged in the descriptions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources