run_crons

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the operation is asynchronous ('async') and directs to get_cron_log for output inspection, which are important behavioral traits. It does not mention side effects, concurrency, or error behavior, but for a simple trigger tool the disclosed information is meaningful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the action ('Trigger cron tasks to run immediately') and includes the async caveat in parentheses. Every word earns its place with no redundancy or irrelevant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the essential aspects: the action, the async behavior, and how to retrieve results. It does not mention potential permissions or error cases, but for a simple one-parameter trigger tool, the provided information is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage for the single required parameter 'ids' described as 'Array of IDs'. The description does not explicitly state that 'ids' refers to cron task IDs, though it is strongly implied by the tool name and description. This is adequate but not additive beyond the schema's minimal definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'trigger' with resource 'cron tasks' and the scoping phrase 'run immediately', which clearly differentiates it from siblings like list_crons, create_cron, update_cron, delete_crons, stop_crons, enable_crons, and disable_crons. It is unambiguous that this tool executes a one-off immediate run of existing cron tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the primary use case ('run immediately') and explicitly points to get_cron_log for inspecting output, which establishes a clear workflow. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the async note and sibling names imply when this tool is appropriate relative to scheduling or monitoring tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.