Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-cold-email

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing cold-email infrastructure: buy domains via Porkbun, import them into CheapInboxes, provision Google/Microsoft mailboxes, and sync credentials to platforms like Instantly and Smartlead.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for SentVia that provides email infrastructure for AI agents, enabling them to create inboxes, send, reply, forward, search messages, manage drafts, domains, webhooks, and allow/block rules through 21 tools.
      21
      58 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Sovereign autonomous mailbox and identity layer for AI agents, providing persistent email identities, object-level security, OTP/2FA capture, link safety analysis, and event-driven email handling via MCP.
      3 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send and receive signed/encrypted mail at agent@domain addresses, manage store-and-forward mailboxes, and operate a double-entry ledger with escrow and bond contracts through MCP tools.
      42 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides temporary email inboxes for AI agents, enabling creation, inspection, and deletion of inboxes, retrieval of messages, and extraction of OTPs and verification links via MCP tools.
      23 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct scopes, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference siblings ('use metrics for account-wide totals, campaign_results for one campaign, list_campaigns for every campaign'). However, the cluster of count-returning tools (campaign_results, metrics, list_campaigns) and the status-returning pair (infrastructure_status, account) rely heavily on descriptions rather than obvious surface distinctions, so an agent could misselect on names alone.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming mixes multiple conventions: bare nouns (inbox, thread, metrics, account, activity), verb_noun (launch_campaign, update_lead, suppress_lead, remove_mailboxes), list_ prefixes (list_campaigns, list_leads, list_messages), and get_/configure_ pairs (get_dashboard/configure_dashboard, get_webhooks/configure_webhook, get_byo_domains/configure_byo_domain). The families are internally consistent and readable, but there is no single predictable pattern across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 28 tools this is on the heavy side, but the platform's apparent scope is genuinely broad: infrastructure provisioning, campaign lifecycle, inbox triage, lead management, webhooks, dashboards, BYO domains, and operator messaging. Each tool occupies a distinct functional slot with minimal redundancy, so the count is justified for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: provision infrastructure, launch/pause campaigns, monitor results, triage replies, manage leads, and downgrade. Missing pieces are mostly deliberate and documented (no resume for paused campaigns, no un-suppress for leads, no campaign edit/delete), and agents can work around them; the absence of a campaign update tool and a manual lead-create path are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues