Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to qwen-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful filesystem MCP server for AI agents with extensive system access, including filesystem operations, shell execution, Windows tools, reverse engineering, code intelligence, and agent orchestration.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.
      104 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server offering hybrid memory recall and continuity tools for AI agents. It also provides a governance gateway that pre-approves risky shell/file/git actions before execution.
      19
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions: files, directories, processes, ports, memory, clipboard, and environment. Mild overlap exists between memory_read and memory_retrieve, and file_exists and get_file_info, but their descriptions are clear enough to prevent frequent misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The toolset is predominantly snake_case with clear verb-noun pairs like write_file, list_directory, kill_process, and send_notification, plus a consistent memory_ prefix. Minor deviations such as rename, file_exists, and http_request, along with noun-first mouse_move and keyboard_type, keep it from being perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is well above the typical well-scoped range and even exceeds the 25-tool threshold. The server spans filesystem, process management, memory, desktop automation, clipboard, environment, notifications, and HTTP, making it feel like several merged servers rather than one focused toolset.

    Completeness4/5

    Each domain has solid core coverage: filesystem CRUD, search, process listing/killing, memory lifecycle, desktop input, clipboard, environment, and HTTP. Minor gaps exist—such as no explicit scroll/drag, no process spawn tool, and limited filesystem metadata operations—but most can be worked around with execute_command.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues