ArXiv Insight MCP Server

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

search_arxiv

Search arXiv papers by topic, author, title, or abstract and cache metadata for resources. Filter by category, year, and sort by relevance or date.

Instructions

Search for papers on arXiv and cache metadata for Resources.

Args:
    topic: The search query. Supports advanced prefixes like 'ti:' (title), 'au:' (author), 'abs:' (abstract).
    max_results: Maximum number of results to return (default: 100, max: 300).
    offset: The index of the first result to return (for pagination).
    category: Optional category filter (e.g., 'cs.AI').
    sort_by: Sort order. Options: 'relevance' (default), 'submitted', 'updated'.
    start_year: Filter by submission year (start). Set to 0 to ignore.
    end_year: Filter by submission year (end). Set to 0 to ignore.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "topic": "<topic>"
    },
    "name": "search_arxiv"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Default
`topic`	Yes
`offset`	No
`sort_by`	No	relevance
`category`	No
`end_year`	No
`start_year`	No
`max_results`	No

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv0.1.0Sep 13, 2026

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does add one genuinely useful disclosure beyond the schema — that searching caches metadata as Resources — but says nothing about rate limits, auth, pagination limits beyond offset, or what the cache write implies for subsequent calls.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in one sentence, followed by a tight Args list where each line adds distinct information. It is slightly list-heavy but no line is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and all seven parameters are covered. The only meaningful gap is the absence of any note about how the cached Resources relate to the search results or what downstream tools expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate fully and it does: it documents the 'ti:/au:/abs:' prefixes for topic, the default and max of max_results, offset as pagination index, an example category, the three sort_by options with the default, and the '0 to ignore' convention for both year filters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence gives a specific verb and resource ('Search for papers on arXiv') plus a disclosed side effect ('cache metadata for Resources'). It is clearly the discovery tool among siblings like get_paper_fulltext and download_pdf, though it never explicitly names an alternative to route against.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the tool name and by the presence of clearly downstream siblings (get_bibtex, download_pdf), but the description never states when to search here versus fetching fulltext or downloading a PDF, and gives no prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server