vercel_list_env_vars
Retrieve all environment variables for a project by providing its project ID.
Instructions
List environment variables for a project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectId | Yes | The ID of the project |
Retrieve all environment variables for a project by providing its project ID.
List environment variables for a project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| projectId | Yes | The ID of the project |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, pagination, or whether sensitive values are masked. The agent has no information beyond the action being a listing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no unnecessary words, front-loading the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with 1 param and no output schema, the description is minimal but lacks usage guidelines and behavioral context, making it less complete than it could be.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'The ID of the project'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and resource 'environment variables for a project', making it specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like vercel_list_projects or vercel_create_env_var.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_env_var for a single variable). The description does not mention prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/XiaYeAI/vercel-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server