Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
XenonFlare MCP Server

XenonFlare MCP Server

by Xenon-Flare
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

upload_video

Upload a video from a public URL to multiple social media platforms with customizable settings for each platform.

Instructions

Upload a video via public URL with platform-specific configurations.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "videoUrl": "<videoUrl>"
    },
    "name": "upload_video"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
videoUrlYesPublicly accessible URL to the video file
titleNoInternal title
descriptionNoInternal description
platformsNo
profileIdNoOptional: Use a pre-defined profile for accounts
scheduledAtNoISO date string
youtubeNo
instagramNo
tiktokNo
linkedinNo
pinterestNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as success/failure responses, processing time, auth requirements, side effects, or how the public URL is handled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence, 9 words). It is front-loaded and to the point, earning its place without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's high complexity (11 params, nested objects, no output schema, no annotations), the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain return values, error conditions, or the overall workflow of uploading to multiple platforms.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 45%, meaning many parameters lack descriptions. The description adds minimal context (URL must be public, configs are platform-specific) but does not elaborate on how to use parameters correctly or their relationships.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Upload a video via public URL with platform-specific configurations' clearly states the action (upload video) and the resource (video via URL), and the mention of platform-specific configs distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_video or upload_image.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like upload_image, or how to choose between using profileId vs manual platform configs. No when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools