Xenmark MCP server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Xenmark MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables read-only file-management operations from AI assistants, including health checks, connection and folder listings, search, share-link resolution, metadata retrieval, and on-demand document reading.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read Moo.team task context directly through the HTTPS API, including descriptions, attributed comments, and file attachments. It is read-only and requires no browser automation.10 npmMIT

AutoRFP.ai MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to connect to AutoRFP.ai and query RFP projects, requirements, tags, and approved content library with read-only access.MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables read-only SQL database access for AI assistants, allowing schema exploration and safe query execution without risk of data modification.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with read-only access to inspect database schemas, preview data, and run safe queries across PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, and SQL Server. It enables AI tools to understand database structures and relationships automatically to generate more accurate code.7 npm7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read Tic lists, tasks, and task images through read-only database queries.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: identity, notifications, projects, drawings, revisions, comment rollup, comments, replies, and drawing search. The only potential overlap (list_drawings vs. find_drawing) is explicitly clarified by descriptions, so an agent can reliably choose the right tool.
All names use a consistent snake_case style with a uniform 'xenmark_' prefix, which makes them predictable and readable. However, the semantic pattern is slightly mixed: most follow list_<noun>, but there are also find_drawing, review_summary, recent_activity, and whoami, so it is not a strict verb_noun convention throughout.
Nine tools is well-scoped for a read-only data-access server covering projects, drawings, revisions, comments, and activity. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, and the set avoids the bloat that would come from exposing every possible field or operation separately.
The read surface is thorough: identity, activity, projects, drawings, revisions, comments, replies, and a review summary are all covered. However, write operations that are central to a review workflow—posting comments/replies, changing comment status, or marking activity read—are entirely absent, creating a notable lifecycle gap.