get_recent_trades
Retrieve recent trades for a specified cryptocurrency pair from Kraken exchange market data.
Instructions
Return recent trades for a pair.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pair | Yes | ||
| since | No | ||
| count | No |
Retrieve recent trades for a specified cryptocurrency pair from Kraken exchange market data.
Return recent trades for a pair.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pair | Yes | ||
| since | No | ||
| count | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description must disclose behavior. It only states 'return recent trades' without details on sorting, pagination, limits, or data freshness. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but at the expense of completeness. It is front-loaded but lacks structure to include necessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, no parameter descriptions, and no annotations, the description fails to provide adequate context for a tool with 3 parameters. Agents cannot reliably invoke this tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%; description adds no meaning to parameters. The meaning of 'since' and 'count' is not explained, leaving the agent to guess their types or formats.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns recent trades for a pair. It is specific about the resource and action, but lacks explicit differentiation from sibling tools like get_trade_history or query_trades.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, context, or alternatives among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/XavierBeheydt/mcp-kraken'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server