Skip to main content
Glama
XTND-DYNAMICS

XTND | MCP | ONE

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to XTND | MCP | ONE

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, and manage email via IMAP, and send emails with attachments via SMTP, using natural language commands.
      301 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.
      1,026 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.
      10
      209 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, enabling reading, searching, sending, and organizing emails with features like smart drafts, scheduling, and attachment handling.
      82 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to connect to any email provider via IMAP/SMTP, supporting account management and email operations like listing, sending, and marking emails.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.
      16
      6 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action/resource: folder lifecycle, email retrieval/search, mailbox mutations, and composing actions do not overlap. Even similar operations like search_emails vs get_recent_emails are separated by explicit filters vs recency.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_, create_, rename_, delete_, get_, search_, mark_, move_, send_, reply_, forward_). This consistency makes the toolset easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the server fully covers folder management and email workflows without padding; each tool corresponds to a meaningful user action. This sits at the upper bound of the ideal range but remains well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers folder CRUD, email search/read/threading, marking/moving/deleting, and send/reply/forward/draft. Minor gaps like editing or sending existing drafts and explicit attachment handling prevent a perfect score.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues