A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceEnables Codex chat to use the Claude Code harness for repository consultation and editing, routing through GPT models via a local proxy.
5 npm
MIT
expert-router
by XM-Chen
Related Servers
Alternatives to expert-router
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
LLM Council MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to consult external LLMs (GPT, Gemini) through multi-turn sessions for second opinions, parallel consultations, and web-grounded research.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with local-first multimodal semantic search across documents, code, images, and video, plus multi-engine web research with active counter-evidence hunting and source-verified, extract-only briefings.3AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to consult Gemini for complex coding problems with session management, file attachments, and conversation persistence.105MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Codex to consult ChatGPT Web through a dedicated Chrome session, acting as a read-only reviewer and senior advisor for code, tests, and designs.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides comprehensive session management for Claude Code with automatic initialization/cleanup, quality checkpoints, and local conversation memory with semantic search for capturing learnings across coding sessions.6336 PyPI2BSD 3-Clause
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion or ambiguous overlap between tools. The purpose of expert_consult is clearly distinct by virtue of being the only operation exposed.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name 'expert_consult' follows a clean verb_noun convention. With no other tools to compare against, naming consistency is trivially maintained.
Tool Count3/5
One tool feels thin for a server named 'expert-router', which implies a broader routing or expert-selection purpose. However, the tool is domain-specific and non-trivial, so it falls in the borderline range rather than being an extreme mismatch.
Completeness2/5
The server exposes only a single consult action with no way to inspect active consultations, list available experts, or manage the feature flag. The description references state ('已有咨询在进行时不要重试') and an enumeration ('reason 必须是闭集之一') but provides no supporting tools, leaving significant workflow gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues