expert-router
Related Servers
Alternatives to expert-router
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Codex chat to use the Claude Code harness for repository consultation and editing, routing through GPT models via a local proxy.5 npmMIT

LLM Council MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to consult external LLMs (GPT, Gemini) through multi-turn sessions for second opinions, parallel consultations, and web-grounded research.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to delegate tasks to ChatGPT through a browser-backed Oracle connection, with project memory and a verified-result cache. It supports preview, delegation, result polling, and explicit acceptance without an API fallback.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to offload noisy commands, large files, and web research to a local OpenAI-compatible LLM, receiving only concise cited answers instead of the raw material. It also optionally delegates writing a single file inside an isolated git worktree, retrying until a Claude-authored test passes.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Codex to use an authenticated ChatGPT Web session as a reasoning and coding backend through isolated browser sessions, without granting ChatGPT direct workspace access.3111 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with local-first multimodal semantic search across documents, code, images, and video, plus multi-engine web research with active counter-evidence hunting and source-verified, extract-only briefings.4AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion or ambiguous overlap between tools. The purpose of expert_consult is clearly distinct by virtue of being the only operation exposed.
The single tool name 'expert_consult' follows a clean verb_noun convention. With no other tools to compare against, naming consistency is trivially maintained.
One tool feels thin for a server named 'expert-router', which implies a broader routing or expert-selection purpose. However, the tool is domain-specific and non-trivial, so it falls in the borderline range rather than being an extreme mismatch.
The server exposes only a single consult action with no way to inspect active consultations, list available experts, or manage the feature flag. The description references state ('已有咨询在进行时不要重试') and an enumeration ('reason 必须是闭集之一') but provides no supporting tools, leaving significant workflow gaps.