Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
AI Intervention Agent

AI Intervention Agent

by XIADENGMA
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Intervention Agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ai-intervention-agent

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time user intervention for MCP agents via a Web UI and interactive_feedback tool, allowing users to review context and send instructions when agents drift from intent.
      MIT

    • Approvals hub

      adamblazer18
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit work for human review over MCP or REST, then retrieve approvals, edits, or change requests without blocking. Reviewers can approve, edit, or send back items from a web or phone interface.
      MIT
    • Datashift MCP Server

      Datashift MCP Serverofficial

      datashift-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit tasks for human or AI review and receive decisions via MCP tools, adding human review checkpoints to workflows.
      MIT

    • vantagate-mcp-server

      Aderix
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Human-in-the-Loop authorization gateway for AI Agents. Securely pause MCP workflows and route high-risk actions to human approvers via Slack or Email.
      60 npm
      1
      MIT

    • agent-chatroom

      meeeeeca2
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a human-in-the-loop dashboard for coordinating multiple AI agents, enabling real-time approval, feedback, and intervention on critical decisions.
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so no selection ambiguity is possible. Its purpose (soliciting human feedback via a Web UI) is stated explicitly and cannot be confused with anything else on the server.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The lone tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun name (`interactive_feedback`) consistent with common MCP conventions. With a single tool there is no opportunity for convention mixing.

    Tool Count4/5

    The server's scope is deliberately narrow — one blocking human-in-the-loop request — so a single tool is defensible rather than thin. A slightly richer surface (e.g. a non-blocking/poll variant) would justify a higher score, but nothing here is redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The ask-feedback lifecycle (render message/options, block, return reply, retry on failure, then surface cause after 3 failures) is well covered, including tolerance for alias parameters from sibling servers. Minor gaps exist: no way to query pending/previous feedback or to check status without issuing a new request.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources