Skip to main content
Glama
XIADENGMA

AI Intervention Agent

by XIADENGMA
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Intervention Agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ai-intervention-agent

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time user intervention for MCP agents via a Web UI and interactive_feedback tool, allowing users to review context and send instructions when agents drift from intent.
      MIT
    • Datashift MCP Server by datashift-io

      Datashift MCP Serverofficial

      datashift-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit tasks for human or AI review and receive decisions via MCP tools, adding human review checkpoints to workflows.
      MIT

    • vantagate-mcp-server

      Aderix
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Human-in-the-Loop authorization gateway for AI Agents. Securely pause MCP workflows and route high-risk actions to human approvers via Slack or Email.
      64 npm
      1
      MIT

    • agent-chatroom

      meeeeeca2
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a human-in-the-loop dashboard for coordinating multiple AI agents, enabling real-time approval, feedback, and intervention on critical decisions.
      Mozilla Public 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap. The tool's purpose of collecting interactive human feedback is clearly defined and easily distinguishable from any potential future tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'interactive_feedback' follows a clear, descriptive snake_case convention. Consistency is trivially maintained since there are no other tools to compare, and the name accurately reflects its function.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels thin for an 'AI Intervention Agent', even if the scope is narrow. It is borderline on the lower end of the tool-count spectrum, but the tool is non-trivial and well-defined, so it is not severely inappropriate.

    Completeness5/5

    For its stated purpose of collecting interactive feedback from a human user, the tool covers the full lifecycle: requesting input, providing options, handling timeouts/retries, and returning results. There are no obvious missing operations within this narrow domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources