nexterm_get_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds nothing beyond that — no note on what fields 'details' comprises, whether missing/invalid IDs error, or what access scope is required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with the verb and resource front-loaded — nothing wasted, but the brevity comes at the cost of substance rather than from efficient packaging of real information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description is the only place an agent could learn what 'details' are returned, and it doesn't say. For an open-world read tool keyed on a bare integer ID, the definition leaves both the input source and the return payload undefined.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the one required parameter, so the description carries the burden of explaining organization_id. It says nothing about it — no indication that it is a numeric identifier, where to obtain it (e.g., from nexterm_list_organizations), or whether it must reference an existing org.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get) and resource (organization), which is enough to know it fetches a single organization. But 'details' is uninformative and the description does nothing to distinguish it from nexterm_list_organizations or nexterm_get_organization_member_permissions, both of which also retrieve organization-scoped data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus nexterm_list_organizations (many vs one), and no prerequisites or exclusions stated. The single-org-by-id intent is only inferable from the required organization_id parameter, not from the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.