Skip to main content
Glama
X1pheR

AsusWRT MCP

by X1pheR
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AsusWRT MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • STB MCP Server

      lightnet19
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for full control of STB (Amlogic S9xx / Armbian) via SSH, enabling shell commands, file management, Docker operations, AdGuard Home configuration, and system monitoring.
      15 PyPI
      MIT

    • ssh-mcp-server

      wijzeu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      SSH-based MCP server that enables remote execution of SSH commands, file transfers, and secure server management via the MCP protocol.
      ISC

    • omv-mcp

      vnaveenb
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes tools to manage and inspect an OpenMediaVault NAS, running on the NAS and communicating over SSH with any MCP-capable coding harness.
      48
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 68 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct router subsystem or action, and descriptions clearly scope them (e.g., DNS config vs. DNS filter vs. DNS privacy). However, the sheer number of similar status tools (e.g., multiple wireless and VPN statuses) increases the chance of misselection for broad queries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the `asuswrt_` prefix and snake_case consistently, with clear, descriptive suffixes. The pattern is predictable across both read-only inspection and write/toggle tools.

    Tool Count2/5

    68 tools is far beyond the typical range for a cohesive MCP server. While the router domain is complex, many status tools could be consolidated into fewer parameterized calls, making the set unnecessarily heavy and harder to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a wide range of router management areas—network, wireless, firewall, VPN, DHCP, DNS, storage, logging, and parental controls—with both read and write operations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no firmware upgrade or full QoS rule management), but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources