Skip to main content
Glama
Wuniq

Wuniq

Official
by Wuniq
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wuniq

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Projectmem

      riponcm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first memory layer for AI coding agents — captures issues, attempts, fixes, and decisions, and warns at git commit before you repeat a mistake.
      17
      799
      MIT

    • memini

      lumayapartners
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first project memory for AI coding agents. Records failed attempts, fragile files, and decisions per repo, and warns the agent via hooks before it repeats a recorded mistake.
      6
      50 npm
      MIT

    • LumenCore

      arclightdynamics
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.
      11 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • ITHZ MCP

      thegobi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first deterministic project memory for AI coding agents, with context packs, decisions, gates, risks, scoped claims and explicit checkpoints in project-owned files.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation2/5

    The single 'run' tool is overloaded with many distinct commands (open, read, search, graph, new, edit, relation, sync, help), making it ambiguous what it does and when to use it versus native tools. Agents may struggle to determine the correct command or differentiate from other tools.

    Naming Consistency1/5

    With only one tool named 'run', there is no pattern to evaluate. The name is overly generic and does not reflect any domain-specific convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single tool for a knowledge engine that supports multiple diverse operations is far too few. Typically, such a domain would require separate tools for each operation (e.g., search, read, create) to avoid overloading and improve clarity.

    Completeness2/5

    While the tool claims to cover many actions, it is monolithic and may be incomplete for complex workflows. The description also defers 'ordinary project files' to native tools, creating potential gaps and reliance on external tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources