A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for Feishu/Lark API integration, enabling AI agents to send messages, manage groups, create and edit documents and spreadsheets, and search knowledge bases.
MIT
lark-agent
by Wulnut
Related Servers
Alternatives to lark-agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA zero-configuration MCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with Feishu (Lark) workspace through OAuth authentication, supporting document operations, content creation, and advanced file management.12 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for TickTick/Dida365 task integration, enabling AI-driven task decomposition and management with automated OAuth authentication.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOfficial MCP server for Feishu/Lark OpenAPI, enabling AI assistants to interact with Feishu/Lark platform for document processing, messaging, calendar scheduling, and more.7,548 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for integrating TickTick task management with AI applications, enabling task and project operations via natural language.8 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for operating Feishu Docs, folders, and attachments, and sending notifications via custom bot webhooks. Enables AI assistants to automate document workflows in Feishu.1MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools target distinct operations (create, list, comment, transition), but update_task and batch_update_tasks overlap significantly since batch_update_tasks also supports single-item updates. Additionally, update_task exposes a status field that partially overlaps with transition_task_status, and get_tasks' related_to filter overlaps with list_child_tasks.
Naming Consistency4/5
The dominant verb_noun pattern is consistent throughout, and most names are self-explanatory. Minor deviations exist: list_projects/list_task_comments vs get_tasks/get_task_detail use both 'list' and 'get' for similar listing operations, and create_task vs add_task_comment mix 'create' and 'add'.
Tool Count4/5
At 16 tools, the surface is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range but still appropriate for the breadth of Feishu project workflows. Each tool serves a plausible need, so the count is not excessive.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers the core lifecycle well: project discovery, task create/get/update, comments CRUD, status transition requirements and execution, child-task binding, and field option lookup. The main gap is the absence of a delete_task tool, and there is no direct way to create or manage projects, though that may be out of scope.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues