pollux-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to pollux-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that provides offline-first, persistent memory for AI coding assistants. It captures project decisions and conventions into a local SQLite database and syncs them to tool-specific memory files like CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md.51MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for persistent, cross-session, local-first memory for AI agents, storing memories as Markdown files with SQLite indexing for hybrid search.24Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local-first MCP server providing persistent, layered memory (episodic, semantic, procedural, resource) for AI agents, with search, versioning, and session management via a single SQLite file.693MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that persists AI coding agent memory and session context, enabling seamless resume across sessions with searchable memories and checkpoints.231MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for sharing source-backed engineering memory across AI coding clients like Cursor and VS Code.301MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a file-first personal memory layer for AI agents, enabling them to store and retrieve memories as markdown files with an SQLite index. The MCP server offers read-only search by default, with optional write tools for manual memory addition and conflict resolution.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially the write operations for issue lifecycle, attempts, fixes, decisions, and notes. However, get_summary, get_context, and search_events all surface overlapping project-memory information, and record_attempt's 'works' case creates some ambiguity with record_fix.
Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case: get_* for reads, and log_/record_/add_ for writes. The pattern is easy to predict and there are no mixed naming conventions or vague generic verbs.
At 15 tools, the server sits at the upper edge of a reasonable scope. Each tool corresponds to a meaningful memory or issue action, but the number of read-only context retrieval tools is slightly high and some could potentially be consolidated.
The core failure-prevention loop is well covered: precheck, log issue, record attempt, record fix, plus decision and note persistence. However, there is no write/update path for project map or plan files, and global gotchas are read-only, leaving minor lifecycle gaps.