send_to_telegram

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the burden. It discloses core behaviors (download using cookies, send to Telegram) but omits important details like error handling, security implications, and return format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, well-structured sentence of 15 words. It front-loads the action and resource, wasting no words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, 7 parameters, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It fails to address error scenarios, authentication details, Telegram credential handling, or expected return values, leaving significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 57% (4 of 7 params described). The description adds a high-level grouping ('using account cookies') but does not elaborate on individual parameters beyond schema. It provides marginal added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool downloads a Grok media post and sends it to Telegram, specifying the resource (Grok post) and target (Telegram). It uniquely distinguishes from siblings, none of which mention Telegram.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when transferring Grok content to Telegram but provides no explicit guidance on prerequisites, alternatives, or when not to use this tool. The lack of usage context is a gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.