wopee-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to wopee-mcp
AlicenseBqualityAmaintenancePostman’s remote MCP server connects AI agents, assistants, and chatbots directly to your APIs on Postman. Use natural language to prompt AI to automate work across your Postman collections, environments, workspaces, and more.426,909 npm316Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables browser automation through Playwright using accessibility tree snapshots instead of screenshots. Supports web scraping, form interactions, testing, and connecting to existing browser sessions with logged-in accounts.8237,044 npm5-
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for end-to-end QA automation: generates test scenarios, discovers Playwright locators, creates TypeScript test code, executes tests, and creates GitHub issues for failures.65 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered E2E testing MCP server. Point at a URL — AI generates test scenarios, runs Playwright tests, and self-heals failures automatically. Works on Canvas and Flutter Web apps.492 PyPI7MIT

AWARSEofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-healing browser automation MCP server integrating Playwright with LLM-assisted locator repair.61MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates Playwright-based UI and API testing, supporting test case generation from requirements or API specs, and execution with detailed reports.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI-powered browser automation, web scraping, and testing using Playwright across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. It allows users to perform actions like navigation, clicking, typing, and taking screenshots through natural language interfaces.6 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude direct control of a real browser via Playwright, enabling AI-driven web testing, autonomous test execution, and live failure analysis through natural language.87,044 npm3-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: variables, suites, artifacts, executions, chat, and GitHub. The three execution-related tools (fetch_test_inventory, fetch_recent_executions, fetch_executed_test_cases) have clear differentiators—full list, recent 20, and post-dispatch results—so no ambiguity remains. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference when to prefer one over another.
All 15 tools follow the `wopee_` prefix with a consistent verb_noun pattern (fetch_, create_, update_, dispatch_, send_, read_, generate_). There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs like 'process' or 'do_thing', making the tool names predictable and self-documenting.
15 tools is well within the ideal 3–15 range and each tool earns its place covering suite lifecycle, artifact management, execution dispatch, variable handling, and chat. The count is neither thin nor bloated, matching the breadth of a testing platform's API.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: create/fetch suites, generate/fetch/update artifacts, dispatch analysis and agents, fetch execution results, manage variables, and send/read chat messages. A GitHub issue creation tool addresses external action items. No obvious dead ends—the only minor gap (no delete suite) is not critical for the domain.