hatchable-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to hatchable-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for deploying projects to multiple cloud platforms (Vercel, Railway, Neon, MongoDB Atlas, Docker) and running local dev servers, with orchestration for full-stack deployments.8-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude to deploy full-stack web apps to Cloudflare, including databases, authentication, and file storage, directly through natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to build, edit, and publish live websites with hosting, database, auth, and domains via the Model Context Protocol.138 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server for Web3, enabling real-time multi-chain wallet execution, smart contract auto-compilation and deployment, token swaps, and asset hosting via Supabase.1-

thinhost-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to publish static sites and build folders as live websites, push updates, provision and manage custom domains with DNS, and send transactional email. Ships as a local pip/uvx server that reads build folders directly, or as a hosted HTTP endpoint for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients.11MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for self-hosted static site publishing on Cloudflare Workers. Enables AI coding agents to deploy pages with a single 'publish' tool and get live URLs, with support for atomic updates, versioning, and per-site passwords.3 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct (file ops vs. deploy vs. env vs. SQL), but write_file/write_files and get_deployment/list_deployments could cause minor confusion. The descriptions are detailed enough that an agent can usually pick correctly.
The set mostly follows verb_noun (read_file, list_files, create_project, delete_file, set_env), with a few exceptions like deploy, grep, and run_code that are verb-only or noun-verb. Still predictable overall.
33 tools is on the heavy side, but the platform covers a full lifecycle: project management, file editing, database, deploy, env, logs, cron, uploads, and account setup. Each tool has a real purpose, though some could be consolidated.
The surface is remarkably complete for a deployment platform: create/read/update/delete for projects and files, SQL execution, schema inspection, deploy with dry-run, function testing, logs, cron, env vars, uploads, forking, and account setup. No obvious dead ends.