get_task
Retrieve the current status and final result of a task by providing its task ID.
Instructions
查询任务状态和最终结果
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | ||
| server | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Retrieve the current status and final result of a task by providing its task ID.
查询任务状态和最终结果
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | ||
| server | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Minimal behavioral disclosure: implies read-only but no details on idempotency, rate limits, or side effects. With no annotations, the description should provide more transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with key information. Efficient but could benefit from one additional sentence for context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite having an output schema, the description lacks context about the workflow (e.g., when to call after submission). Minimal for a task retrieval tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters beyond their implied roles. 'server' parameter is not clarified, leaving ambiguity.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool queries task status and final results, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like cancel_task or submit_task, though it could be more explicit about the scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as after submitting a task or for checking results. No context about prerequisites or related operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Wolido/OpenAaaS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server