close_browser
Close the current browser instance to end the browsing session and free system resources.
Instructions
Close the current browser instance
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Close the current browser instance to end the browsing session and free system resources.
Close the current browser instance
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks behavioral details beyond the basic action of closing. No annotations exist to compensate. Important aspects like irreversible loss of session data or browser state are not disclosed, leaving the agent to infer the implications.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, with no unnecessary words. Every sentence—just one—earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema) and the sibling suite context, the description is nearly adequate. However, it omits any mention of side effects or safety considerations, which an agent might need for robust execution.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema is empty and fully covered (100%), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter information beyond the schema, which is acceptable given no parameters exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Close the current browser instance' uses a specific verb ('Close') and clearly identifies the resource ('current browser instance'). It effectively distinguishes the tool from its sibling 'launch_browser', which performs the opposite action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the purpose is clear, there is no mention of preconditions (e.g., ensuring a browser is open) or related operations (e.g., launching before closing).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Wladastic/mcp-browser-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server