gemini-media-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gemini-media-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA remote MCP server that lets Claude generate and edit images, start short videos, produce speech, and transcribe audio through xAI's media models, returning previews and files for review. It enforces per-call, per-session, daily and monthly spend caps behind owner-only OAuth access, with content tripwires that refuse unsafe prompts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables video and image generation from any MCP client, with support for models like Veo 3.1, Grok Imagine, and Nano Banana, including text-to-video, image-to-video, image generation and editing.465 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone and design voices, and create related media outputs.493 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents from an MCP client to control Google Flow through a signed-in Chrome session, generating videos and images with Veo, Nano Banana, and Omni while managing projects, assets, scenes, characters, and shot lists with spending-approval guards and a sandboxed file vault.5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to discover OpenRouter image and video models, generate and edit images, create variations, launch and monitor video jobs, and save resulting media into authorized local project directories with cost controls.10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients like Claude and ChatGPT to generate images and videos, animate images, create lip-synced videos, list TTS voices, and manage media via remote MCP tools.-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: image creation, image editing, model listing, video job start, video job polling, and budget reporting. The only mild overlap is that list_models shows prices while cost_report shows spend, but their purposes (catalog vs. accounting) are clearly separated.
Five of six tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (generate_image, edit_image, list_models, start_video, get_video_status). cost_report is a noun phrase and breaks the pattern slightly, but the set remains highly readable and predictable.
Six tools is well-scoped for a media generation + budget server, with each tool earning its place. The async video flow is correctly split into start/status rather than bloating the surface.
Core lifecycle is covered: model discovery, image create/edit, video start/poll, and cost tracking. Minor gaps exist — no job cancellation, no way to list previously generated assets or inspect a single video job without downloading, and no equivalent edit_video.