MCP PDF Forms
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_pdfsB | |
| extract_form_fieldsC | |
| highlight_form_fieldA | |
| render_pdf_pageB | |
| extract_textA | |
| search_textA | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. extract_form_fields handles form-specific metadata, extract_text retrieves raw text, highlight_form_field visually marks form fields, list_pdfs enumerates files, render_pdf_page generates page images, and search_text performs pattern matching. The descriptions reinforce these unique roles, making tool selection straightforward.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as extract_form_fields, highlight_form_field, and render_pdf_page. The naming is predictable and readable throughout, with no deviations or mixed conventions, enhancing clarity and usability.
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for PDF form and content processing. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects like extraction, rendering, listing, and searching, without being overly sparse or bloated. This count aligns well with the domain's typical operations.
The tool set provides strong coverage for PDF form and text operations, including extraction, rendering, listing, and searching. A minor gap exists in form field modification (e.g., fill_form or update_form_field), but agents can work around this by using other tools or external methods. Core workflows are well-supported.