Wicked MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Wicked MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenance250+ AI-powered MCP tools: research, write, code, translate, scrape, sentiment, vision, RAG, agent memory, marketplace, trading signals, and more. 15 models across 7 providers. Pay-per-use via API key or x402 USDC micropayments.67 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCrypto intelligence MCP: 104 tools for market data, ML signals, on-chain analytics, derivatives, and Bittensor subnets. Pay-per-call via x402 USDC on Base/Solana/Algorand/Stellar or $9.99/mo API key.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access professional crypto market intelligence via 8 MCP tools, covering market regime, fear/greed, funding rates, DeFi yields, token signals, wallet risk, and contract audits. Backed by real-time data from Binance, DeFiLlama, Etherscan, with both free tools and x402 micropayment options.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePay-per-call ($0.005-$0.03 USDC) market, on-chain, and prediction-market data API for AI agents and trading bots via x402 — no signup, no API key. Remote MCP server, 28 tools: token security (honeypot/liquidity/counterfeit checks), Hyperliquid oracle-gap risk, kimchi premium, funding APR, DEX slippage, Polymarket arbitrage/liquidity audits, Hyperliquid HIP-4 odds.2281MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEight crypto and DeFi data tools for AI agents: prices, gas, one ParaSwap route quote, GoPlus token security and top-holder samples, DefiLlama yields, Hyperliquid/dYdX funding, and observed wallet balances. Inspect prices free; pay 0.001–0.008 USDC per call on Base through x402. No API key or subscription.886 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables crypto intelligence, GitHub trends, prediction market signals, token analysis, and AI content advisory via 23 MCP tools, with free options and paid tools through x402 micropayments.2360 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 70 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes and the namespace prefixes (memory_, paywall_, identity_, broker_sync_, protocol_health_, registry_, reputation_) sharply separate the sub-domains. A few overlaps exist—e.g. orderbook vs kalshi_market (which bundles an orderbook), price vs ohlcv, market_overview vs market_clock, and reputation_status vs reputation_statement—but descriptions disambiguate them. Overall selection is reasonably unambiguous despite the large surface.
The bulk of the server uses a consistent prefix_verb_noun pattern (memory_store, paywall_create_route, broker_sync_register_user, identity_get_nonce), and prefixes are stable per sub-service. However, the entire Trading Data group breaks convention with bare nouns lacking any verb or prefix (sentiment, price, orderbook, gas, fvg, atr), producing a mixed set of conventions across the server. Still readable but inconsistent.
At 70 tools this is far beyond the well-scoped 3-15 range and sits in the 'too many' tier. Although it aggregates roughly ten distinct sub-services (each individually coherent), the raw volume makes the overall set heavy and hard to reason about as a unit.
Coverage is strong across most sub-domains: Memory offers full CRUD plus history, update-versioning and deletion audit; Paywall has complete route lifecycle (create/import/update/delete/list/settlements); Identity, Registry, Reputation and Broker Sync each cover their core lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no broker disconnect/delete, limited write ops on some oracles), but the surface is broadly complete for its stated purposes.