Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Sandbox Code Auditor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Full-stack security for AI agents — static analysis + MCP runtime interception. 31 rules detect prompt injection, data exfiltration, backdoors, tool poisoning, and cross-file attack chains. Includes MCP proxy for real-time blocking, Python AST taint tracking, multi-language injection detection (8 languages), and AI-powered deep analysis. Free, offline, zero-config.
      83 npm
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local, dependency-free security scanning tools for LLM configurations, prompts, RAG sources, and more, enabling AI coding agents to detect prompt injections and other vulnerabilities without external network access.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Real security scanners for AI coding agents — SAST (441 rules), secret detection (419+ patterns), dependency CVEs (OSV.dev), MCP/skill vetting, MITRE ATT&CK. Open-source, Rust, free
      14 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to perform static security linting for issues like dynamic eval, secret leaks, and insecure regexes, plus sub-millisecond AST symbol search across large repositories through the Model Context Protocol. It offers a zero-dependency, pure ESM runtime suited to high-concurrency agent workflows.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
      1
      10 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a completely distinct artifact and vulnerability class (Python AST escape, SQL taint, regex ReDoS, Seccomp BPF, CORS headers). There is no realistic scenario where an agent would confuse one for another, and the descriptions reinforce the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five names follow a strict snake_case pattern of <domain>_<subject>_<agent-noun>, e.g. python_ast_sandbox_escape_detector, regex_redos_exponential_scanner. The convention is applied uniformly with no stylistic deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for a focused security-audit server, with each tool covering a distinct check. No tool feels redundant or missing for the stated surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers several sandbox-relevant classes (escape, SQLi, ReDoS, seccomp, CORS) but omits common adjacent checks like shell injection, deserialization/pickle, and path traversal. Agents can work around these gaps, and notably one tool generates filters while the rest audit, a minor asymmetry.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues