delete_ticket
Delete a Jira issue using its ID or key. Requires permission.
Instructions
Delete an issue (requires permission).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issueIdOrKey | Yes | Issue ID or key to delete |
Delete a Jira issue using its ID or key. Requires permission.
Delete an issue (requires permission).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issueIdOrKey | Yes | Issue ID or key to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description barely discloses that deletion is destructive and permission-dependent. It fails to mention irreversibility, cascading effects, or return behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficient and well-structured for the minimal content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's low complexity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally viable but still lacks behavioral context like reversibility or typical use cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description is already present. The tool description adds no extra semantic value beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and resource ('issue'), distinguishing it from siblings like create or assign. However, it could be more specific by noting the system (e.g., 'Jira issue').
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like edit or assign. The only hint is 'requires permission', which is vague and not actionable.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Wasim-Shaikh25/jira-mcp-auth'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server