Apifox MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIFOX_TOKEN | Yes | Your Apifox API token | |
| APIFOX_PROJECT_ID | Yes | Your Apifox project ID |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| import_openapiA | 维护 Apifox 接口文档:将 OpenAPI/Swagger 规范导入到 Apifox 项目。支持 OpenAPI 3.0/3.1 和 Swagger 2.0 格式。 ⭐ 最佳实践(强烈推荐):
分批导入的好处:更安全、更可控、支持模块独立维护、避免大规模误操作。 |
| export_openapiA | 查看 Apifox 接口文档:从 Apifox 项目导出接口信息。重要:在导入新接口前,务必先使用 summary 模式查看现有目录结构和接口列表,以便将新接口放入合适的目录中,保持项目结构一致性。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: export_openapi retrieves existing interface information for viewing and planning, while import_openapi adds new OpenAPI/Swagger specifications into the project. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the task.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (export_openapi and import_openapi), using the same base noun 'openapi' with descriptive action verbs. This naming scheme is predictable and enhances readability across the tool set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for managing Apifox interface documentation, a domain that typically involves more operations like updating, deleting, or searching interfaces. While export and import cover core workflows, the limited count may restrict agent capabilities in handling full lifecycle tasks.
The tool set is severely incomplete for interface documentation management. It lacks essential CRUD operations such as updating or deleting interfaces, and there are no tools for searching or summarizing beyond the export's summary mode. This creates significant gaps that could lead to agent failures in maintaining a comprehensive project structure.