Skip to main content
Glama
WarinChi

ranger-rag-mcp

by WarinChi

Related Servers

Alternatives to ranger-rag-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for a modular RAG system that enables natural language question answering over enterprise documents with intent-aware routing, adaptive retrieval, and citation-backed responses.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server with a RAG knowledge tool that enables AI agents to search enterprise documents using natural language queries.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-grade RAG server with a centralized knowledge base, offering both MCP and REST APIs for semantic search, document ingestion, and RAG-based answers.
      12
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A governed MCP server for integrating AI agents with customer data, featuring role-based access control, field redaction, and human-in-the-loop approval for secure support operations.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: querying a KB, listing accessible KBs, checking access pre-flight, and listing all policies. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause confusion, as even the access check in query is incidental to its primary function.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (query_knowledge_base, list_knowledge_bases, check_access, list_policies). The two 'list' verbs are used consistently with different objects, and there are no mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped count for a RAG query service with authorization checks. Each tool covers a necessary function without redundancy, fitting the typical 3-15 range comfortably.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflows of querying, listing accessible bases, pre-flight access checks, and viewing policies are covered. Minor gaps exist such as no policy management or write operations, but these are likely out of scope for a read-oriented query server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing