shadow-vision
Related Servers
Alternatives to shadow-vision
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for vision AI — screenshots to code, OCR, error diagnosis, and image analysis via OpenAI-compatible APIs.82MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides vision capabilities to coding agents, enabling them to analyze screenshots, UI mockups, terminal errors, documents, tables, and charts through OpenAI-compatible vision models. Supports local stdio and remote HTTP deployments with structured JSON output and binary upload side channels.848 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives Claude and other clients vision capabilities including screenshot-to-code, OCR, error diagnosis, diagram analysis, data-viz insights, UI diff checks, and video analysis via any OpenAI-compatible vision endpoint.20,834 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal vision-capable MCP server that lets AI agents describe screenshots, UI, charts, and photos via vision and OCR tools, with support for multiple providers and automatic fallback.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA multi-model vision MCP server that gives image understanding to AI coding models lacking native vision, letting them analyze screenshots of code, errors, UI, and documents or perform OCR. It routes requests through major vision LLM providers and can be shared over local networks via HTTP or Docker.1,048 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA multi-model vision MCP server that gives image understanding to AI coding models lacking native vision, letting them analyze screenshots, error images, UIs, documents, and OCR content through a single unified tool. It supports several mainstream vision LLM providers plus any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, with automatic image cropping, compression, and retry handling.1,048 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct output modality: description, annotations, OCR text, layout JSON, code reconstruction, and multi-image comparison. Some boundary blur exists between vision_inspect (general description, which may incidentally read text) and vision_ocr, and between vision_layout and vision_reconstruct, but the descriptions clarify the intended scope of each.
All six tools follow a strict vision_<verb> snake_case pattern (inspect, annotate, ocr, layout, reconstruct, compare). The convention is predictable and readable throughout.
Six tools is well-scoped for a vision-analysis server, with each tool earning its place by covering a distinct capability. No redundant or filler tools are present.
The surface covers the major analysis workflows: description, OCR, annotation detection, layout parsing, code reconstruction, and multi-image comparison. Minor gaps like detecting/returning bounding boxes or image generation/editing exist, but they are outside the apparent analysis-focused purpose.