Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to shadow-vision

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides vision capabilities to coding agents, enabling them to analyze screenshots, UI mockups, terminal errors, documents, tables, and charts through OpenAI-compatible vision models. Supports local stdio and remote HTTP deployments with structured JSON output and binary upload side channels.
      8
      23 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives Claude and other clients vision capabilities including screenshot-to-code, OCR, error diagnosis, diagram analysis, data-viz insights, UI diff checks, and video analysis via any OpenAI-compatible vision endpoint.
      10,124 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local vision-capable MCP server that lets AI agents describe screenshots, UI, charts, and photos via vision and OCR tools, with support for multiple providers and automatic fallback.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides vision understanding capabilities such as image analysis, OCR, object localization, and video frame analysis, plus optional image generation and editing, to coding agents via OpenAI-compatible multimodal models. Runs as a local MCP server with HTTP and stdio transports, configurable for clients like Codex, Claude Code, Kimi, and Cursor.
      3
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct output modality: description, annotations, OCR text, layout JSON, code reconstruction, and multi-image comparison. Some boundary blur exists between vision_inspect (general description, which may incidentally read text) and vision_ocr, and between vision_layout and vision_reconstruct, but the descriptions clarify the intended scope of each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All six tools follow a strict vision_<verb> snake_case pattern (inspect, annotate, ocr, layout, reconstruct, compare). The convention is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a vision-analysis server, with each tool earning its place by covering a distinct capability. No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the major analysis workflows: description, OCR, annotation detection, layout parsing, code reconstruction, and multi-image comparison. Minor gaps like detecting/returning bounding boxes or image generation/editing exist, but they are outside the apparent analysis-focused purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues