CocoInbox MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CocoInbox MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceConnects MCP clients to any IMAP/SMTP email account, enabling email search, reading, sending, replying, forwarding, flagging, moving, and folder management via natural language.17MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to manage email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, including reading, searching, sending emails with attachments and calendar invites, all through natural language interactions with MCP-compatible clients.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching, reading full conversations, and sending email across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes from any MCP client, with multi-user support and per-user API tokens.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEmail capabilities for AI agents to receive, read, reply, and send through MCP.3 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables reading and sending emails via IMAP and SMTP through the MCP protocol. Supports multiple email accounts and configuration via UI or environment variables.BSD 3-Clause
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects any IMAP/SMTP mailbox to AI agents via MCP, enabling email read, search, send, reply, and management through natural language.3 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Several tools overlap heavily: login, connect, complete_login, and login_with_password all handle authentication, while request_missing_tool is an alias for submit_idea and list_my_tool_requests is an alias for list_my_ideas. create_folder and create_folder_for_email also have blurred boundaries. The CRM and security clusters are clearer, but overall an agent could easily select the wrong auth or alias tool.
Most tools consistently use snake_case verb_noun naming, and the crm_* cluster is very coherent. However, bare/alias names like connect, request_missing_tool, and list_my_tool_requests break the pattern, and domain prefixes are inconsistently applied across auth, mail, security, and company tools.
With 35 tools, this exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. The set spans auth, mail, security, ideas, CRM, and company profile, but several tools are aliases or near-duplicates, so the count feels inflated rather than well-scoped. Consolidating auth entry points and removing aliases would bring it closer to a reasonable size.
Core workflows exist for authentication, ephemeral email, dark-web scanning, ideas, company profile, and CRM lead/task management. However, lifecycle coverage has notable gaps: there is no delete for folders, emails, leads, groups, or tasks, and no general task creation outside generated prospect tasks. These gaps create dead ends that agents can partially work around but not fully resolve.