Skip to main content
Glama
WadeWareing

io.github.hhopke/intervals-icu-mcp

by WadeWareing

icu_create_event

Create a single calendar event from scratch, specifying start date, name, category, and optional workout or availability details.

Instructions

Create ONE new calendar event from scratch.

For two or more events in a single call, prefer icu_bulk_create_events over a loop. For copying existing events forward in time (repeating a workout for N weeks), use icu_duplicate_events — that tool reuses an existing event's payload instead of taking new fields.

For category guidance and the training_availability enum, read the intervals-icu://event-categories resource. For structured WORKOUT events, put workout-syntax text in description — see intervals-icu://workout-syntax.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesEvent name
colorNoCustom display color (hex string)
categoryYesEvent category enum. Common: WORKOUT, NOTE, RACE_A/B/C, TARGET, PLAN, HOLIDAY, SICK, INJURED. Full list with use-case guidance and the training_availability enum: intervals-icu://event-categories resource. Legacy aliases RACE→RACE_A, GOAL→TARGET accepted.
end_dateNoEnd date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Use for ranged categories (INJURED, SICK, HOLIDAY, SEASON_START) to mark a multi-day block.
athlete_idNoAthlete ID (for coaches managing multiple athletes)
event_typeNoActivity discipline (NOT the category): Ride, Run, Swim, Walk, Hike, WeightTraining, Workout, VirtualRide, VirtualRun, Other (full discipline list: intervals-icu://event-categories resource). Required for RACE_A/B/C events.
start_dateYesStart date in YYYY-MM-DD format
descriptionNoEvent description (plain text for non-workouts). For WORKOUT events the server parses this into structured, device-syncable steps with zones and a training load. Use Intervals.icu workout syntax: one step per line as '- <duration> <target>' (duration FIRST), grouped under Warmup / Main / Cooldown headers. Targets: bike '- 5m 85%', '- 5m Z4', or absolute '- 5m 210w'; HR '- 10m 70-80% HR' or '- 10m 145bpm'; run/swim pace '- 5m Z2 Pace', absolute only with a trailing 'pace' word: '- 5m 4:45/km pace', '- 200mtr 1:45/100m pace' (bare '5:00/km' or '1:45/100m' silently drops); threshold is relative — run '- 25m 100% pace', swim CSS '- 200mtr 100% pace' — the words 'threshold'/'CSS'/'5K pace' are NOT parsed as targets. Add cadence to any step: '- 3m Z2 90rpm'. No target: '- 20m free'. Repeats: put 'Nx' after a section name with steps flat beneath, and leave a blank line before and after the repeat block (without it the repeat silently runs only once) — e.g. 'Main 5x' then '- 3m 110%' / '- 3m 50%'. Ramps: '- 10m ramp 50-70%'. Rest: append 'Ns rest' to a step ('- 200mtr Z2 20s rest') or use a separate '- 20s intensity=rest' step (only intensity=rest exports as a device rest step) — never a bare '- 20s' step (that becomes work, not rest). Durations: 'm'=minutes, 's'=seconds; distance steps use 'mtr'=meters / 'km' / 'yrd' (e.g. swim '- 400mtr Z2 Pace'). Do NOT write '[repeat 5x ...]', nested bullets, or 'Z5 3m' (target before duration). Runs need a pace or HR target — a bare 'Z2' gives no load. Full reference: intervals-icu://workout-syntax resource.
show_as_noteNoShow event as a note marker on the fitness chart
training_loadNoPlanned training load
distance_metersNoPlanned distance in meters
duration_secondsNoPlanned duration in seconds
show_on_ctl_lineNoRender event on the CTL line
not_on_fitness_chartNoHide event entirely from the fitness chart
training_availabilityNoTraining availability: NORMAL, LIMITED, or UNAVAILABLE. Typical for INJURED/SICK/HOLIDAY blocks.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this is a non-read-only, open-world, non-destructive, non-idempotent mutation. The description adds useful context: it creates exactly one event, workout syntax in the description field is parsed into structured device-syncable steps, and alternative tools should be used for bulk or duplication. It does not warn about duplicate event creation on retry or mention permission prerequisites, but overall it adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tightly focused paragraphs. The purpose and scope are front-loaded, alternatives are enumerated clearly, and resource pointers close the description without redundant detail. Every sentence adds routing or reference value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 15-parameter mutation tool with an output schema, the description covers its purpose, sibling alternatives, and relevant resources, while the schema covers parameter details. A minor gap is the absence of an explicit non-idempotency warning about retries creating duplicates, but annotations and the bulk/duplicate routing largely cover the agent's needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all 15 parameters in detail, including the workout syntax. The description points to the same resources the schema already references and adds no new parameter-level semantics, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (create) and resource (calendar event) with scope clarified as 'ONE new calendar event from scratch.' It differentiates from sibling tools by explicitly naming icu_bulk_create_events and icu_duplicate_events and describing when each applies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes multi-event creation to icu_bulk_create_events and existing-event duplication to icu_duplicate_events. It also specifies which resource to consult for category and training_availability guidance, leaving no ambiguity about when to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools