sherweb-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sherweb-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for agents to onboard, pay, and provision services autonomously with InFlow6MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Oitvoip (NetSapiens) that exposes domain, reseller, device, subscriber, and CDR tools via the ns-api.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server wrapping the Chargebee REST API to manage customers, subscriptions, invoices, and transactions.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with the SuperOps.ai PSA/RMM platform, providing tools for managing clients, tickets, assets, and technicians via GraphQL API.21Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the MSPbots Agent Platform tenant/user API, allowing an Agent to list all platform tenants via a single tool.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Kaseya SaaS Alerts, providing tools to query security events, manage customers/users, handle devices, billing, reports, and partner settings via the External Partner API.-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource or action: list/get for customers and subscriptions, payable vs receivable for billing direction, and dedicated tools for charge details, quantity changes, amendment status, catalog products, navigation, and status. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.
All tools share the sherweb_ snake_case prefix and mostly group by domain, but the pattern varies between domain_action (customers_list, subscriptions_get) and domain_noun_phrase (billing_payable_charges, customers_accounts_receivable), with two meta tools (navigate, status) outside the pattern. This is readable but not perfectly uniform.
12 tools is well within the ideal range and appropriately scoped for a Sherweb billing/customer/subscription server. Each domain has a focused set of tools with no obvious bloat or redundancy.
The set covers read operations and subscription quantity changes well, but there are notable gaps: no customer create/update/delete and no subscription purchase/cancel tools. Listing sellable products without a way to actually create a subscription is a significant missing workflow.