cipp-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cipp-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides comprehensive Microsoft Teams and Graph API access, enabling AI assistants to manage multi-tenant messaging, search, file operations, and user management.3332 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Blackpoint Cyber MDR platform, enabling management of security monitoring, threat detection, and incident response through Blackpoint's API.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Microsoft 365 administration using the Microsoft Graph API, enabling user, group, and mailbox management.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Action1, a cloud-native RMM platform, enabling remote monitoring, patch management, and endpoint management through Action1's API.63Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Datto BCDR (Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery), enabling management of backup jobs, restore points, and disaster recovery operations through Datto's API.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for SuperOps PSA/RMM, enabling MSPs to manage tickets, assets, clients, and field technician operations through SuperOps's API.223Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 47 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct resource and action, and descriptions explicitly differentiate near-pairs like cipp_list_mailbox_usage vs cipp_get_mailbox_usage. However, cipp_list_standard_templates vs cipp_list_standards and cipp_get_tenant_drift vs cipp_get_tenant_alignment could still be confused by an agent without close reading.
All tools use the cipp_ prefix and snake_case verb-first names, predominantly list/get/create/set/run, so the pattern is easy to follow. Minor deviations like cipp_ping and cipp_bec_check are readable but keep this from being perfectly uniform.
At 47 tools, this is well beyond the 3-15 sweet spot and into the 25+ range that burdens tool selection. Even for a broad M365 management platform, many read-only list tools could be consolidated or selectively exposed.
The surface has broad read coverage and some high-impact writes (user create/edit/disable/reset/offboard, group create, standards templates, OOO/forwarding). But many resources lack full lifecycle: no user delete, no group update/delete, no Conditional Access write, no GDAP invite management, no license assignment, and mailbox permissions remain read-only.