Autotask MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Autotask MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides a comprehensive interface for interacting with the ConnectWise Manage API, simplifying API discovery, execution, and management for both developers and AI assistants.2 npm18-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants and development tools to interact with ServiceNow instances, providing comprehensive API coverage for incident management, change management, CMDB, and other ServiceNow modules.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects AI assistants to OpenCTI threat intelligence platforms. It enables natural language interaction for searching threat intelligence, analyzing reports, managing indicators, and monitoring connectors.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server enabling AI agents to access and manipulate ServiceNow data through natural language interactions, allowing users to search for records, update them, and manage scripts.47MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing AI assistants with comprehensive project, task, and subtask management capabilities with project-specific storage.2912 npm89MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for KikoBooks enterprise bookkeeping software that enables AI assistants to perform accounting operations on accounts, customers, invoices, bills, and more through natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 98 tools
Tools are mostly entity-scoped (get_/search_/create_/update_/delete_), but the sheer volume and some near-duplicates (e.g., get_ticket_details vs search_ticket_history, service_call_ticket association vs service_call CRUD) can confuse. The meta tool list_categories is also odd in a flat toolset.
Naming is predominantly consistent with an autotask_<verb>_<entity> pattern. Minor inconsistencies: list_* vs search_* (list_phases, list_categories) and get_ticket_details vs get_ticket_history where 'details' is vague.
98 tools is far beyond the practical limit for MCP usability. Even for a broad PSA platform, the count will overwhelm context windows and decision-making. Several tools are narrowly scoped (e.g., search_service_call_tickets) and could be merged or split more judiciously.
The surface covers many core entities (tickets, companies, projects, service calls, quotes, billing), but significant gaps exist: no update/delete for notes or attachments, no update/delete for tasks or projects, no search/get for service calls (only create/delete/link), and opportunities/products/contracts are read-only.