Skip to main content
Glama
WYRE-AI

Autotask MCP Server

by WYRE-AI

Related Servers

Alternatives to Autotask MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides a comprehensive interface for interacting with the ConnectWise Manage API, simplifying API discovery, execution, and management for both developers and AI assistants.
      2 npm
      18
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants and development tools to interact with ServiceNow instances, providing comprehensive API coverage for incident management, change management, CMDB, and other ServiceNow modules.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects AI assistants to OpenCTI threat intelligence platforms. It enables natural language interaction for searching threat intelligence, analyzing reports, managing indicators, and monitoring connectors.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server enabling AI agents to access and manipulate ServiceNow data through natural language interactions, allowing users to search for records, update them, and manage scripts.
      47
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for KikoBooks enterprise bookkeeping software that enables AI assistants to perform accounting operations on accounts, customers, invoices, bills, and more through natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 98 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Tools are mostly entity-scoped (get_/search_/create_/update_/delete_), but the sheer volume and some near-duplicates (e.g., get_ticket_details vs search_ticket_history, service_call_ticket association vs service_call CRUD) can confuse. The meta tool list_categories is also odd in a flat toolset.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming is predominantly consistent with an autotask_<verb>_<entity> pattern. Minor inconsistencies: list_* vs search_* (list_phases, list_categories) and get_ticket_details vs get_ticket_history where 'details' is vague.

    Tool Count2/5

    98 tools is far beyond the practical limit for MCP usability. Even for a broad PSA platform, the count will overwhelm context windows and decision-making. Several tools are narrowly scoped (e.g., search_service_call_tickets) and could be merged or split more judiciously.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers many core entities (tickets, companies, projects, service calls, quotes, billing), but significant gaps exist: no update/delete for notes or attachments, no update/delete for tasks or projects, no search/get for service calls (only create/delete/link), and opportunities/products/contracts are read-only.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive