note_get
Retrieve a note by ID via token. Purpose: test and learn about object-level authorization bugs (BOLA/IDOR) in multi-tenant tools.
Instructions
Get one note by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes | ||
| id | Yes |
Retrieve a note by ID via token. Purpose: test and learn about object-level authorization bugs (BOLA/IDOR) in multi-tenant tools.
Get one note by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes | ||
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No behavioral traits are disclosed beyond the basic operation. The description is minimal and does not address side effects, idempotency, or error behavior, and there are no annotations to compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, efficient and front-loaded, but sacrifices detail for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no output schema and two parameters, the description is too brief. It does not explain what is returned or any important context like existence handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description only mentions 'id' for retrieval but does not explain the 'token' parameter or provide any additional semantics beyond the input schema, which has 0% description coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get one note by id', specifying the verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like note_create or note_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus others, nor any prerequisites or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/WRG-11/mcp-objauthz-lab'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server