NL-GOV-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to NL-GOV-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables a unified AI assistant that combines document retrieval (RAG), database queries via MCP tools, and web search, allowing users to ask complex questions and receive answers from multiple enterprise sources.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables autonomous orchestration of vector search, knowledge graph queries, and web crawling through a single MCP interface, providing agentic RAG capabilities for AI assistants.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Switzerland's national metadata catalogue, enabling AI agents to discover datasets, APIs, public services, and publishers through free-text search and structured queries.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides queryable access to official UAE open data through MCP tools, resources, and prompts, with bilingual support and multiple data connectors.55 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn unofficial MCP server providing access to Dutch government open data from data.overheid.nl, CBS statistics, and KVK business registry. Enables natural language queries for discovering datasets, inspecting metadata, and querying data without API keys or authentication.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables querying over 3,200 Dutch statutes (AVG, Wetboek van Strafrecht, Burgerlijk Wetboek, etc.) with verbatim, citation-grounded text from official sources, directly from MCP-compatible AI assistants.1848 npm13Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 64 tools
Most tools are clearly distinguished by their source prefix and action verb, e.g., bag_address_detail vs. bag_linked_data_select. However, some overlap exists between generic search tools (e.g., cbs_tables_search, cbs_observations) and the smart router nl_gov_ask, which could cause confusion for an agent.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: source prefix (e.g., bag_, cbs_, duo_) followed by a descriptive verb_noun. This makes it easy to predict tool names and understand their domain.
With 64 tools, the server covers an extremely broad range of Dutch government data sources. While each tool serves a specific purpose, the sheer number may be cumbersome for an agent to navigate, suggesting a potential need for modularization.
The tool set covers major domains (addresses, statistics, cadastre, legislation, etc.) with read operations. However, some sources only offer discovery without full text retrieval (e.g., dso_omgevingsdocumenten_search, ruimtelijke_plannen_search), leaving gaps for detailed data access.