claude-augur-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to claude-augur-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to inspect local Claude Code and Codex CLI usage, route tasks to the best available plan, and query remote plan data, recent changes, and recommendations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Claude Desktop to persist decisions, rules, bugs, to-dos, and failed approaches from chats into a markdown file in the repository, then bring the relevant ones back in later sessions and flag tool calls that may break saved rules.236 npmMIT

MatterAI MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables code reviews, implementation planning, and pull request generation for AI agents in IDEs like Cursor and Windsurf.1MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides a workspace-safe, read-only bridge between browser-based AI planning/review and local coding agents, enabling structured plan, execution summary, and review handoffs without granting shell, file write, or Git push access.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTurns Claude Code into a recursive analysis engine that builds explorable decision trees from IF/THEN chains, enabling thorough problem exploration and structured synthesis of action plans.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns a rambling app idea into a structured planning canvas of screens, flows, systems, data and open questions inside an existing Claude Code or Codex session, then writes the settled plan back to that session as a spec to build from. Plans are stored in the project's .doan/ folder alongside the code.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool is exposed, so there is no possibility of selecting the wrong tool or confusing overlapping purposes. Its purpose—extracting plan structure and returning an inline template—is clearly stated.
The sole tool uses a clear snake_case name with a consistent augur_ prefix. With only one tool, there are no naming inconsistencies to evaluate.
One tool is thin for an MCP server, but it matches a narrow, single-purpose helper. It is borderline rather than extreme because the operation is non-trivial and self-contained.
The tool covers the stated operation of extracting plan structure and producing a renderable template. There are no lifecycle operations like validation or template customization, but those are not clearly required by the described scope.