Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mcp-Omega-Brain

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides cryptographic identity and signing capabilities for AI agents, enabling them to create persistent identities, sign actions with private keys, and allow external systems to verify the authenticity and provenance of agent-initiated operations.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Security scanner for MCP servers. Detects prompt injection, command injection, auth bypass, and excessive permissions across tools, resources, and prompts.
    11 npm
    2
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables deterministic verification of AI agent decisions and actions, providing PASS/FAIL/ABSTAIN verdicts with replayable proofs and an optional signed receipt ledger.
    33 npm
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Gates every AI agent tool call against your policy before it runs, then writes a hash-chained, tamper-evident record of what was decided and what happened. Anyone can verify that record offline, without your software, your systems or any key you hold.
    2,554 PyPI
    13
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to be governed by formal Gentzen sequent calculus proof trees, with human-in-the-loop approval gates and cryptographic audit trails for consequential actions.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to sign decisions with post-quantum cryptographic proofs and maintain secure audit trails for compliance. It provides tools for stamping events, verifying chain integrity, and exporting audit data across industries like finance and healthcare.
    4
    52 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 27 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly defined role: omega_* tools handle context, storage, alignment, execution, and reporting, while veritas_* tools are specialized gates with discreet purposes and explicit cross-references (e.g., omega_rag_query vs omega_vault_search, omega_cortex_check vs omega_cortex_steer, veritas_evidence_gate vs veritas_compute_quality). The descriptions carefully disambiguate overlapping-sounding tools, so an agent can accurately select the right tool for a given task.

Naming Consistency5/5

All names follow a consistent snake_case convention with a clear two-part prefix taxonomy: omega_* for brain/memory/governance operations and veritas_* for verification pipeline operations. Verbs and nouns are consistently separated and meaningful (e.g., ingest, search, check, steer, run_pipeline, resolve, transition), making the toolset predictable and scannable.

Tool Count2/5

With 27 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold that marks an heavily oversized set. While each tool individually has a purpose, the sheer number places a significant cognitive burden on an agent and requires the agent to parse many near-similar gates and helpers; a more consolidated surface (e.g., merging that run_pipeline already wraps individual gates) might be more appropriate.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers the full lifecycle of the domain: context loading, semantic storage/retrieval, alignment checking, audit sealing, session persistence, handoffs, and the total VERITAS 10-gate pipeline. Missing pieces are minor (e.g., no individual trace gate, no deletion/update operations for stored fragments), but the does not create blocking gaps for the can be worked around via the pipeline and report tools.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive