No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 32 tools
Most tools clearly target distinct resources (proposals, clinks, milestones, projects, permissions) with action-specific verbs, making selection straightforward. The only notable overlap is between get_clinks and check_inbox, both retrieving clinks but with different intents (filtered search vs. inbox check). Overall, the risk of misselection is low.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_, get_, create_, update_, complete_, etc.). Verbs are action-specific and nouns identify the resource, creating a highly predictable and uniform naming convention. There are no mixed styles or vague verbs.
With 32 tools, the server significantly exceeds the threshold for 'too many' (25+). While the breadth reflects a comprehensive collaboration platform, this quantity is overwhelming and likely to increase agent confusion and selection cost. The tool set could be split into focused servers or consolidated to reduce redundancy.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle for projects, milestones (including checkpoints), and proposals, with create/read/update/complete/archive/reopen operations. However, there are no delete operations for any major entity, and proposals and clinks lack update functionality. These gaps are minor and can be worked around via completion or archival, so agents are unlikely to hit dead ends.