delete_comment
Delete a comment by its ID. Author or admin permission required.
Instructions
Delete a comment by id. Author or admin only.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| comment_id | Yes | Comment id (from add_comment or list_comments) |
Delete a comment by its ID. Author or admin permission required.
Delete a comment by id. Author or admin only.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| comment_id | Yes | Comment id (from add_comment or list_comments) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses authorization requirements but does not mention side effects, return value, or whether deletion is permanent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with two sentences. Every word adds value, and there is no redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter, the description covers the core purpose and authorization. However, it lacks mention of the return value or confirmation message, which would be helpful given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema covers 100% of parameters with a description for comment_id. The description adds context on where to obtain the id ('from add_comment or list_comments'), which aids correct invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (delete), resource (comment), and method (by id). It distinguishes from sibling tools like edit_comment and add_comment.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description includes an authorization constraint ('Author or admin only') but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like editing the comment.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VoidNullable/lific'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server