Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to bsl-ls-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to run project-wide 1C/BSL diagnostics and per-method cyclomatic/cognitive complexity analysis, returning a ranked refactor triage of what to fix first alongside 25 navigation, search, format and fix tools. Deployed over Streamable HTTP behind nginx with bearer-token auth, one container per project, using a pure-Python engine with no Java or LSP bridge.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Rust-native code index MCP server with first-class 1C:Enterprise (BSL) support. Static binary, no runtime — 25 MCP tools (18 universal + 7 BSL-specific), tree-sitter AST for 10 languages, federation across multiple repos.
      147
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching and analyzing 1C enterprise metadata and BSL code using a SQLite backend. Enables querying configuration structure, code routines, and performing compliance checks via natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that validates AI-generated 1C:Enterprise (BSL) code against the real platform API. Catches unknown enum values, wrong argument counts, and missing type members by parsing the platform syntax-helper (shcntx_ru.hbk) — independent Rust implementation with built-in expression validator.
      30
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to explore and search a 1C:Enterprise configuration codebase, including metadata objects, module procedures, call graphs, and semantic similarity search.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to perform local code search, indexing, and analysis across Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, .NET/C#, and Python projects through the MCP protocol.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct aspects: complexity, definition, callees, callers, diagnostics, and reindex. However, bsl_references ('where the method is used') and bsl_callers ('who calls the function') could be confused as overlapping in purpose, even though callers is more specific to incoming calls.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent bsl_ prefix followed by a single descriptive concept in lowercase snake_case (e.g., bsl_complexity, bsl_definition, bsl_callers). The pattern is predictable and uniform across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a language server focused on navigation, call analysis, diagnostics, and indexing. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or excessive breadth.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core navigation (definition, references), call hierarchy (callers/callees), complexity, diagnostics, and reindexing. Minor gaps exist, such as direct module content retrieval or symbol search, but these are not critical for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues