Skip to main content
Glama
VitexSoftware

mcp-server-filesystem

by VitexSoftware
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-filesystem

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • filesystem-mcp-with-FastMCP

      Bosaj
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a sandboxed filesystem API for AI agents, enabling natural-language file read, write, append, delete, move, list, create, and metadata operations through MCP tools.
      1
      -

    • maic-server-fs-mcp

      maicFir
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLMs with local filesystem operations (read/write files, list directories) and command execution via MCP, enabling file management and task automation within AI clients.
      7
      15 npm
      ISC

    • Filesys

      YothisisTroy
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A Filesystem MCP server that allows an LLM to read and list files from a specified directory on your local machine through the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      -

    • filesystem_mcp_server

      RAJPUTDEE
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents and MCP clients to read, list, write, search, watch, and batch-process files within configured allowed directories, while exposing discoverable file resources and structured error codes.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct filesystem operation: read, write, list, search, move, copy, delete, create directory, stat, and exists. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are lowercase and readable, but the convention is mixed: some use verb_noun (write_file, list_dir, glob_search) while others are bare verbs or familiar commands (move, copy, delete, stat, exists, mkdir). This is not chaotic, but it is not a consistently applied pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range for a filesystem server and each tool covers a core operation without redundancy. The set is neither too thin nor overloaded.

    Completeness5/5

    The domain is fully covered: reading, writing, listing, searching, moving, copying, deleting, creating directories, checking existence, and fetching metadata. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core filesystem operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources