organize_hierarchy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavior. It fails to indicate whether the operation is destructive, reversible, or requires specific selections. The brief phrase does not convey side effects or state changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (4 words), which sacrifices informativeness for brevity. While concise, it omits essential details and does not front-load key information effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's likely complexity (organizing hierarchy with multiple objects) and the presence of an output schema, the description should explain what the tool does, returns, and requires. The sparse description leaves major gaps, making it incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'kwargs' has no schema description (0% coverage) and the description does not explain what keys or values it expects. This makes the parameter a black box, offering no semantic help to the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Parent objects and move to collections' gives a general idea of the tool's function but is vague. It does not specify whether 'parent objects' means setting parent-child relationships or organizing a hierarchy, and 'move to collections' is ambiguous. Compared to sibling tools with clearer names, this lacks precision.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'transform_objects' or 'create_primitive'. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusion criteria, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.