SkillMapper MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to SkillMapper MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous, evidence-driven screening of technical candidates by evaluating resumes against job descriptions and rubrics, producing ranked scores, gap analyses, and audit-ready PDF, HTML, and Markdown reports.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables job seekers to structure job descriptions, search a personal Markdown profile with hybrid BM25/dense retrieval, and compare a posting against that profile to see which requirements are supported, weak, or missing evidence. It also tracks applications and follow-up deadlines through JSON-backed tools whose writes stay as previews until a human turn confirms them.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover postings from watched company boards ranked by keyword fit, tailor and fact-check resumes against a source-cited profile, render ATS-readable PDFs, submit applications through the user's own browser, and track replies and follow-ups. All ranking, claim checking and email classification run as plain code, so LLM tokens are spent only on writing.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to resolve occupations into O*NET/ESCO work primitives, audit resumes against ATS gatekeepers, and simulate adversarial hiring committees for deterministic career verification.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables an AI client to manage candidate profiles and job postings stored in a local PostgreSQL database, match them deterministically, and generate tailored resume and cover-letter PDFs in English, French, German, and generic formats. It runs over stdio or a loopback HTTP endpoint with a bearer token, exposing 34 tools by default plus opt-in tools for imports, link fetching, deletions, and document export.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to automate recruiter workflows through batch candidate search, resume screenshot/OCR viewing, share-link extraction, scoring and filtering, local database persistence, and Markdown report export.-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
search_documents and retrieve_evidence both retrieve content, which could cause confusion, but the descriptions differentiate them (broad hybrid search vs. targeted evidence for a specific requirement). The other three tools (compare, capture_feedback, lookup) are clearly distinct.
All five tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: search_documents, retrieve_evidence, compare_resume_to_job, capture_reviewer_feedback, lookup_evaluation_result. Verbs are varied but appropriate and readable.
Five tools is reasonably scoped for a resume-vs-job evaluation domain, covering search, targeted retrieval, the full comparison agent, feedback, and result lookup. It is slightly lean but each tool earns its place.
The lifecycle is mostly covered (search, retrieve, compare, capture feedback, lookup results), but there is no ingestion tool despite descriptions referencing 'ingested' chunks, and no update/delete or reviewer-triage operations. These gaps may force agents to look outside the server.