Skip to main content
Glama
VishweshMurali

SkillMapper MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to SkillMapper MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous, evidence-driven screening of technical candidates by evaluating resumes against job descriptions and rubrics, producing ranked scores, gap analyses, and audit-ready PDF, HTML, and Markdown reports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover postings from watched company boards ranked by keyword fit, tailor and fact-check resumes against a source-cited profile, render ATS-readable PDFs, submit applications through the user's own browser, and track replies and follow-ups. All ranking, claim checking and email classification run as plain code, so LLM tokens are spent only on writing.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables resume review against job descriptions through a three-stage pipeline: match scoring, experience rewriting, and ATS optimization. Supports text or document uploads.
      0
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to upload resumes and receive structured ATS scores with parseability, section coverage, contact-info, and keyword analysis, along with qualitative improvement suggestions via an LLM.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables parsing a master resume, analyzing job descriptions for ATS/match scores, generating truthful tailored resumes, tracking applications, and producing PDF reports through Claude Desktop.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns any AI assistant into an ATS-optimized resume engine that tailors resumes to job descriptions, validates candidate intake, analyzes gaps, scores matches, and renders DOCX/PDF outputs.
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    search_documents and retrieve_evidence both retrieve content, which could cause confusion, but the descriptions differentiate them (broad hybrid search vs. targeted evidence for a specific requirement). The other three tools (compare, capture_feedback, lookup) are clearly distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: search_documents, retrieve_evidence, compare_resume_to_job, capture_reviewer_feedback, lookup_evaluation_result. Verbs are varied but appropriate and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is reasonably scoped for a resume-vs-job evaluation domain, covering search, targeted retrieval, the full comparison agent, feedback, and result lookup. It is slightly lean but each tool earns its place.

    Completeness3/5

    The lifecycle is mostly covered (search, retrieve, compare, capture feedback, lookup results), but there is no ingestion tool despite descriptions referencing 'ingested' chunks, and no update/delete or reviewer-triage operations. These gaps may force agents to look outside the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues