gmail-multi-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gmail-multi-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interacting with multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server, supporting search, labels, drafts, and thread management with per-account OAuth.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching, reading, and drafting emails across multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables connecting Gmail to MCP clients, allowing search, read, send, reply-all, forward, attachments, drafts, labels, and thread management across multiple Google accounts at once via a self-hosted Cloudflare Worker.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing multiple Gmail accounts through a single MCP server, with independent OAuth per account, supporting email read, search, labeling, drafting and sending, as well as calendar and iCal feed operations.41Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Gmail to AI assistants via the MCP protocol, enabling search, read, send, and manage emails across multiple Google accounts simultaneously.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server for managing multiple Gmail accounts with separate OAuth grants, supporting search, retrieval, labels, drafts, and attachments while deferring direct send and destructive actions for safety.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Every tool targets a distinct action and resource (accounts, threads, messages, drafts, labels, attachments). There is no ambiguity between similar operations like trash_thread vs trash_message or label_thread vs label_message, as the descriptions clearly differentiate the scope.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., create_draft, list_labels, send_message). The verbs are clear and uniform, making the tool set predictable for an agent.
With 22 tools, the server covers the core Gmail API surface comprehensively, including account management. While this is above the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server, each tool serves a distinct purpose and the count is justified by the multi-account complexity.
The tool set covers CRUD operations for threads, messages, drafts, and labels, plus search, attachments, and account management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit mark-as-read or spam tools), but these are handled indirectly through labeling and the core workflows are well-supported.